On Sun 2011-01-02 10:49:32, David Brown wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, Jan 02 2011, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c
> >> > index 6470f63..155ec10 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c
> >> > @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@
> >> >  static inline u32 __dcc_getstatus(void)
> >> >  {
> >> >  	u32 __ret;
> >> > -
> >> > -	asm("mrc p14, 0, %0, c0, c1, 0	@ read comms ctrl reg"
> >> > +	asm volatile("mrc p14, 0, %0, c0, c1, 0	@ read comms ctrl reg"
> >> >  		: "=r" (__ret) : : "cc");
> >> >  
> >> >  	return __ret;
> >
> > Is volatile needed here? If __dcc_getstatus() return value is
> > discarded, we want assembly discarded, right?
> 
> That's not really the issue being fixed.  Without the volatile, the
> compiler is free to cache and reuse a previously loaded status value.
> It is important that the status be read each time.
> 
> I don't think there is a way of indicating that assembly needs to happen
> for each use, but that it is OK to discard if the value isn't used.
> 'volatile' is a bit overloaded.

Ok, thanks for explanation.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/