Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Daniel Baluta
Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011 - 12:48 pm

Hello,

I have some style comments, please read below.


Is there any strong reason to have this camel case naming?
I would prefer tx_msgs, rx_msgs etc..


Here you have mixed naming conventions. I guess
tx_timeout will fit in better than txTimeout.


same here.


thanks,
Daniel.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol, Daniel Baluta, (Sun Jan 2, 12:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol, Stefani Seibold, (Sun Jan 2, 2:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Jan 2, 2:40 pm)