> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
quoted text
> 
> > ok, this one got no objection except original patch author.
> 
> Would you care to respond to my objections?
> 
> I replied to these two patches earlier with my nack, here they are:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128273555323993
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128337879310476
> 
> Please carry on a useful debate of the issues rather than continually 
> resending patches and labeling them as bugfixes, which they aren't.

You are still talking about only your usecase. Why do we care you? Why?
Why don't you fix the code by yourself? Why? Why do you continue selfish
development? Why? I can't understand.



quoted text
> > then, I'll push it to mainline. I'm glad that I who stabilization
> > developer have finished this work.
> > 
> 
> You're not the maintainer of this code, patches go through Andrew.
> 
> That said, I'm really tired of you trying to make this personal with me; 
> I've been very respectful and accomodating during this discussion and I 
> hope that you will be the same.

As I said, You only need to don't break userland and fix the code immediately.
You don't have to expect stabilization developer allow userland and code
breakage.



--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/