On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:42:20PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Any comment to this patch?
> 
> Looks good to me especially given the unique implications for
> callbacks.  Although, I'd like to put a description of the
> prep_dma_cyclic semantics in the source code.  Can you respin this
> with a description added to the kernel-doc for struct dma_device?

Sure, will do.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/