Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_watchdog

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 9:39 am

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:27 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

The smp_processor_id() right at the start already does that.

That said, I doubt it really matter one way or the other, compilers have
been known to do CSE for quite a while.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
fix BUG: using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watchdog an ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Fri Aug 13, 3:21 am)
[PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watc ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Mon Aug 16, 7:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_ ..., Frederic Weisbecker, (Mon Aug 16, 7:59 pm)
[PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_watc ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Tue Aug 17, 12:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_ ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Tue Aug 17, 1:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_ ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Tue Aug 17, 2:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_ ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Tue Aug 17, 3:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_ ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Tue Aug 17, 3:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] fix BUG using smp_processor_id() in touch_nmi_ ..., Frederic Weisbecker, (Tue Aug 17, 7:48 pm)
[PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touch_wa ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Wed Sep 22, 2:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touc ..., Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Sep 22, 9:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touc ..., Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Sep 22, 9:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touc ..., Frederic Weisbecker, (Wed Sep 22, 9:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] avoid second smp_processor_id() call in __touc ..., Sergey Senozhatsky, (Sat Sep 25, 10:43 am)