Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf, x86: Fix accidentally ack'ing a second event on intel perf counter

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Don Zickus
Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010 - 1:00 pm

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:26:27PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

No, you have to write a '1' to clear.  If a new bit is set after we read
it, then our 'status' var should have a '0' in that bit and thus will not
get cleared when we ack it.

Cheers,
Don
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf, x86: Fix accidentally ack'ing a seco ..., Don Zickus, (Thu Sep 2, 1:00 pm)
[tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Fix accidentally ack'ing a se ..., tip-bot for Don Zickus, (Fri Sep 3, 12:10 am)