login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
September
»
2
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Jan Engelhardt
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010 - 7:25 am
On Thursday 2010-09-02 15:32, Neil Brown wrote:
quoted text
>> >> Oh and I what I like to see is support for multiple readonly branches :) > >I think we very nearly have that, assuming I understand your requirement >correctly. >The lower filesystem can itself be an overlay, providing it is mounted >read-only. > >So if /mnt/ro1 /mnt/ro2 /mnt/ro3 are all read-only branches then > > mount -o ro,lowerdir=/mnt/ro1,upperdir=/mnt/ro2 meaninglessstring /mnt/ov1 > mount -o ro,lowerdir=/mnt/ov1,upperdir=/mnt/ro3 meaninglessstring /mnt/ov2 > mount -o lowerdir=/mnt/ov2,upperdir=/mnt/rw ignoreme /mnt/overlay > >and /mnt/overlay will be the combination of 3 read-only filesystems and one >writable one. >(this doesn't work with the code as-is, but it is really just a few bug-fixes >away).
There ought to be a reason that other implementations offer doing multiple branches with a single vfsmount. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Fri Aug 27, 12:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Fri Aug 27, 1:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Fri Aug 27, 4:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Fri Aug 27, 9:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Sat Aug 28, 9:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Mon Aug 30, 3:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Mon Aug 30, 4:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Mon Aug 30, 5:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Valerie Aurora
, (Mon Aug 30, 11:38 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Mon Aug 30, 4:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Tue Aug 31, 4:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Tue Aug 31, 4:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Kyle Moffett
, (Tue Aug 31, 8:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Valerie Aurora
, (Tue Aug 31, 12:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Valerie Aurora
, (Tue Aug 31, 12:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Trond Myklebust
, (Tue Aug 31, 1:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Valerie Aurora
, (Tue Aug 31, 1:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Valerie Aurora
, (Tue Aug 31, 6:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Trond Myklebust
, (Tue Aug 31, 9:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Tue Aug 31, 9:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Wed Sep 1, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Thu Sep 2, 6:15 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Neil Brown
, (Thu Sep 2, 6:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Thu Sep 2, 7:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Miklos Szeredi
, (Thu Sep 2, 7:28 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Thu Sep 23, 6:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype
, Valerie Aurora
, (Thu Sep 23, 12:22 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Michael Trimarchi
Re: [PATCH] VFS: make file->f_pos access atomic on 32bit arch
Miklos Szeredi
[patch 14/15] vfs: more path_permission() conversions
Serge E. Hallyn
Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 7/8] Infrastructure for shared objects
Bernd Schmidt
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Takashi Iwai
[PATCH 2/2] input: Add LED support to Synaptics device
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Eyvind Bernhardsen
Re: Where has "git ls-remote" reference pattern matching gone?
Shawn O. Pearce
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Todd Zullinger
Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: rfc2047-quote subject lines with non-ascii characters
Santi Béjar
Re: How to use git-fmt-merge-msg?
linux-netdev
:
Ramkrishna Vepa
[net-2.6 PATCH 1/10] Neterion: New driver: Driver help file
Mark Anthony
invitation / inquiry
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 08/16] dma-debug: add core checking functions
David Miller
Re: [PATCH 1/3] f_phonet: dev_kfree_skb instead of dev_kfree_skb_any in TX callback
Sascha Hauer
[PATCH 03/12] fec: do not typedef struct types
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
amba: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Yosemite: Convert SMP startup lock to arch spinlock.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: S5PC100: IRQ and timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
davinci: edma: clear interrupt status for interrupt enabled channels only
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, mm, kprobes: fault.c, simplify notify_page_fault()
openbsd-misc
:
Daniel A. Ramaley
Re: [semi-OT] Can anyone recommend an OpenBSD-compatible colour laser printer?
Matthias Kilian
Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv
Tobias Ulmer
Re: Problem after upgrade 4.5 to 4.6: ERR M
Philip Guenther
Re: SIGCHLD and libpthread.so
J.C. Roberts
Re: [semi-OT] Can anyone recommend an OpenBSD-compatible colour laser printer?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate