Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thursday, September 2, 2010 - 2:19 am

On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Valerie Aurora wrote:

Not a big deal, just set up nd as if this was a single component
lookup.  The previous version did it like this:

+       struct nameidata nd = {
+               .last_type = LAST_NORM,
+               .last = *name,
+       };
+
+       nd.path = pue->upperpath;
+       path_get(&nd.path);
+
+       newdentry = lookup_create(&nd, S_ISDIR(attr->ia_mode));

But that's not a solution to the NFS suckage, it's just a workaround.

"Fortunately" NFS isn't good for a writable layer of a union for other
reasons, so this isn't a big concern at the moment.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Aug 26, 11:33 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Wed Sep 1, 2:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Sep 2, 2:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Sep 2, 2:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Sep 2, 2:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Sep 3, 1:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Sep 3, 2:16 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Sep 3, 5:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] union: hybrid union filesystem prototype, David P. Quigley, (Thu Sep 9, 9:02 am)