On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 03:16:59PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > > How about the following? It records a delta and checks if delta is negative
> > > and would cause underflow.
> > >
> > > unsigned long zone_nr_free_pages(struct zone *zone)
> > > {
> > >         unsigned long nr_free_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
> > >         long delta = 0;
> > >
> > >         /*
> > >          * While kswapd is awake, it is considered the zone is under some
> > >          * memory pressure. Under pressure, there is a risk that
> > >          * per-cpu-counter-drift will allow the min watermark to be breached
> > >          * potentially causing a live-lock. While kswapd is awake and
> > >          * free pages are low, get a better estimate for free pages
> > >          */
> > >         if (nr_free_pages < zone->percpu_drift_mark &&
> > >                         !waitqueue_active(&zone->zone_pgdat->kswapd_wait)) {
> > >                 int cpu;
> > >
> > >                 for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > >                         struct per_cpu_pageset *pset;
> > >
> > >                         pset = per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu);
> > >                         delta += pset->vm_stat_diff[NR_FREE_PAGES];
> > >                 }
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         /* Watch for underflow */
> > >         if (delta < 0 && abs(delta) > nr_free_pages)
> > >                 delta = -nr_free_pages;
> 
> Not sure what the point here is. If the delta is going below zero then
> there was a concurrent operation updating the counters negatively while
> we summed up the counters.

The point is if the negative delta is greater than the current value of
nr_free_pages then nr_free_pages would underflow when delta is applied to it.

quoted text
> It is then safe to assume a value of zero. We
> cannot really be more accurate than that.
> 
> so
> 
> 	if (delta < 0)
> 		delta = 0;
> 
> would be correct.

Lets say the reading at the start for nr_free_pages is 120 and the delta is
-20, then the estimated true value of nr_free_pages is 100. If we used your
logic, the estimate would be 120. Maybe I'm missing what you're saying.

quoted text
> See also handling of counter underflow in
> vmstat.h:zone_page_state().

I'm not seeing the relation. zone_nr_free_pages() is trying to
reconcile the reading from zone_page_state() with the contents of
vm_stat_diff[].

quoted text
> As I have said before: I would rather have the
> counter handling in one place to avoid creating differences in counter
> handling.
> 

And I'd rather not hurt the paths for every counter unnecessarily
without good cause. I can move zone_nr_free_pages() to mm/vmstat.c if
you'd prefer?

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/