On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Greg KH wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
> > > We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch
> > > mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet.
> > > Do you know what happened to that?
> > 
> > right, patch below is needed to fix things.
> > 
> > Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165
> > for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon...
> 
> I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet.
> 
> And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert
> and do a new release?

Any answers on this?

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/