Re: [PATCH] i2c: cyttsp i2c and spi touchscreen driver init submit

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Henrik Rydberg
Date: Friday, August 6, 2010 - 5:49 pm

On 08/07/2010 02:32 AM, Kevin McNeely wrote:

[...]




There is nothing preventing you from keeping say a dkms package somewhere with
all options intact. However, for the kernel, it is a question of
maintainability. If the driver can produce prefectly valid data using protocol
B, and by doing so several hundred lines of code can be removed, that is very
much preferred. Since both protocols can be translated to protocol B via mtdev,
which is already very much in use, there is little reason to support protocol A
when the device can do tracking.

Thanks,
Henrik
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] i2c: cyttsp i2c and spi touchscreen driver ini ..., Henrik Rydberg, (Fri Aug 6, 5:49 pm)