Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thursday, August 5, 2010 - 10:19 pm

On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:28:28 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:


The preferred technique here is

#ifndef flush_tlb_nonprotect_page
#define flush_tlb_nonprotect_page(vma, address) flush_tlb_page(vma, address)
#endif

so no need for __HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_TLB_NONPROTECT_PAGE. 
include/asm-generic/pgtable.h uses a mix of the two techniques.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Shaohua Li, (Thu Aug 5, 8:28 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Andrew Morton, (Thu Aug 5, 10:19 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Shaohua Li, (Thu Aug 12, 5:47 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Aug 13, 12:29 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Aug 13, 2:08 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Suresh Siddha, (Fri Aug 13, 4:00 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Shaohua Li, (Sun Aug 15, 6:16 pm)
Re: [patch]x86: avoid unnecessary tlb flush, Shaohua Li, (Sun Aug 22, 5:43 pm)
[tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Avoid unnecessary TLB flush, tip-bot for Shaohua Li, (Mon Aug 23, 10:57 am)