If these changes went through Russell's tree there would be
dependancies on arch/arm/mach-tegra/(Makefile|Kconfig) in
arch/arm/(Makefile|Kconfig) breaking Russell's tree until it was
merged with the tegra tree.  That sounds wrong to me.  Additionally
these patches have received review on LAKML including some by Russell
and nothing was mentioned about this being a problem.

There is a conflict on these against linux/master.  I'm rebasing now for Linus.

-Erik

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:10 -0700, Erik Gilling wrote:
>>  arch/arm/Kconfig                               |   25 +-
>>  arch/arm/Makefile                              |    1 +
>
> In the future could you please send changes to arch/arm/Kconfig and
> arch/arm/Makefile to Russell .. That way there's no chance for conflicts
> with other -next trees.
>
> Daniel
> --
> Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
>
>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/