Re: direct-io regression [Was: How to track down abysmal performance ata - raid1 - crypto - vg/lv - xfs]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dominik Brodowski
Date: Thursday, August 5, 2010 - 9:35 am

Small correction:

On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:35:19PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:

The speed-up of the unencrypted access (18 -> 28 MB/s) is caused by using a
different configuration for kernel 2.6.35; and seems to be unrelated to your
patch. Will try to track down which config option is the culprit.


kernel, dmcrypt?	| good config | bad config
-------------------------------------------------
patched 2.6.35, dmcrypt	  ~ 18 MB/s	~ 13 MB/s
patched 2.6.35		  ~ 28 MB/s	~ 18 MB/s
-------------------------------------------------
plain 2.6.35, dmcrypt	  ~  3 MB/s	~  3 MB/s
plain 2.6.35		  <not tested>	~ 16 MB/s	


Best,
	Dominik
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: direct-io regression [Was: How to track down abysmal p ..., Dominik Brodowski, (Thu Aug 5, 9:35 am)
Performance impact of CONFIG_DEBUG? direct-io test case, Dominik Brodowski, (Thu Aug 5, 1:47 pm)
Performance impact of CONFIG_SCHED_MC? direct-io test case, Dominik Brodowski, (Thu Aug 5, 1:54 pm)