On 08/05/2010 12:45 AM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
quoted text
> 
> To make sure I understand correctly, you suggest to initialize
> tramponline_pg_dir in the boot sequence of the first cpu and fork
> swapper_pg_dir from it later on?
> 

Correct.

quoted text
>> I realize this isn't how the 64-bit code works at the moment, but in a
>> lot of ways I think it would be better if it did.
> 
> Yeah, may make sense. This patch already brings the 32 bit
> implementation closer to the 64 bit one. On 64 bit things are somewhat
> simpler because the tramponline page table can be defined at
> compile-time there (contains only 2 pgd_t entries) while on 32 bit we
> have to initialize it at runtime.

Correct, again.  It's unclear to me if we can get away with the very
simple 64-bit approach -- in particular, not including all the 1:1
mappings in the kernel -- for all future users, though.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/