Re: Linux 2.6.35

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 - 1:15 pm

On 08/02/2010 10:31 PM, Donald Parsons wrote:


The modules are not necessarily the same:  "libahci" was introduced in

	commit 365cfa1ed5a36f9bcb9f64c9f0f52155af2e9fef
	Author: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
	Date:   Sun Mar 28 00:22:14 2010 -0400

	    ahci: Move generic code into libahci

so there exists the possibility that the initramfs builder, or whatever 
is being used to load your ATA drivers, missed this dependency.  Modern 
initramfs builders should be able to figure out module dependencies, so 
this /shouldn't/ be an issue...  but it might be.

	Jeff



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Sun Aug 1, 7:31 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Sun Aug 1, 8:28 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Bjorn Helgaas, (Sun Aug 1, 8:38 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Sun Aug 1, 9:21 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Bjorn Helgaas, (Mon Aug 2, 6:48 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Harald Hoyer, (Mon Aug 2, 8:59 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Harald Hoyer, (Mon Aug 2, 9:08 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Mon Aug 2, 11:38 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Frédéric L. W. Meunier, (Mon Aug 2, 3:09 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Frédéric L. W. Meunier, (Mon Aug 2, 3:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Mon Aug 2, 7:31 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Aug 2, 9:42 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Stefan Richter, (Tue Aug 3, 3:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Tue Aug 3, 9:26 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Aug 3, 9:40 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Tue Aug 3, 10:45 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Tue Aug 3, 11:26 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Aug 3, 11:35 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Aug 3, 3:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Aug 4, 1:15 pm)