Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kyle Moffett
Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 - 8:05 am

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:24, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:

There's certainly already weird behaviors you can cause by regular
filesystem over-mounts on NFS.  For example, I have an NFS server that
exports a "/srv/git" directory; if I was to do the following actions
on a client:

# mkdir /srv/git
# mount -t nfs myserver:/srv/git /srv/git
# mkdir /srv/git/mnt
# mount -t ext3 /dev/sda3 /srv/git/mnt

And then from the server I were to:
# rmdir /srv/git/mnt

Terrible terrible things would happen... by which I mean I can no
longer access or unmount that filesystem from the client.  That use
case in particular seems to be much worse than your regular unionfs
example even, and it's easily possible today (even by accident).

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Fri Aug 27, 12:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Aug 27, 1:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Fri Aug 27, 4:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Aug 27, 9:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Sat Aug 28, 9:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon Aug 30, 3:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Mon Aug 30, 4:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon Aug 30, 5:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Mon Aug 30, 11:38 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Mon Aug 30, 4:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Tue Aug 31, 4:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Tue Aug 31, 4:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Kyle Moffett, (Tue Aug 31, 8:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Tue Aug 31, 12:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Tue Aug 31, 12:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Trond Myklebust, (Tue Aug 31, 1:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Tue Aug 31, 1:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Tue Aug 31, 6:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Trond Myklebust, (Tue Aug 31, 9:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Tue Aug 31, 9:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Sep 1, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Sep 2, 6:15 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Neil Brown, (Thu Sep 2, 6:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Sep 2, 7:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Sep 2, 7:28 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Sep 23, 6:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] hybrid union filesystem prototype, Valerie Aurora, (Thu Sep 23, 12:22 pm)