On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 16:31 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

quoted text
> Of course, with -rt and the pte lock becoming a mutex, all of your
> changes do become necessary (and I suppose that's where they come from).
>
> Now, those changes won't technically hurt on a non-rt kernel, tho they
> will add a tiny bit of overhead. I'll see if I can measure it.

Indeed, those parts are only strictly needed for -rt, I was hoping the
tiny bit of overhead wouldn't be too bad and we could keep it.

If not I guess we should put those two bits in __switch_to() under
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT and carry them there for a little while longer.

quoted text
> > I suppose that's what's causing the similar patch you have in -rt to
> > fail btw. This could be fixed easily by using "current" instead.
> 
> And here's a fix. Using current_thread_info() everywhere is better
> anyways, you are not supposed to touch the local_flags within anything
> but "current" so we may as well make it explicit.
> 
> Feel free to fold that into your -rt patch and this one if you decide
> not to drop that whole part. 

Thanks! And yeah I'd prefer to keep it to reduce Thomas' burden if
possible.


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/