On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Gui Jianfeng
<guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
quoted text
>  o Each cfq group has its own group service tree.
>  o Each cfq group contains a "group schedule entity" (gse) that
>    schedules on parent cfq group's service tree.
>  o Each cfq group contains a "queue schedule entity"(qse), it
>    represents all cfqqs located on this cfq group. It schedules
>    on this group's service tree. For the time being, root group
>    qse's weight is 1000, and subgroup qse's weight is 500.
>  o All gses and qse which belones to a same cfq group schedules
>    on the same group service tree.

Overall, I like this approach.  It's similar to what we are using with
earlier hierarchical patches.  Can you improve the naming a little
bit?  "qse" and "gse" look almost identical and breaks my brain.
Maybe "queue_entity" and "group_entity"?  If entity is to much to
type, then "item"?

Chad
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/