> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > References :
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround