Re: Linux 2.6.35

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 - 9:40 am

On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:26:50 -0400 Donald Parsons wrote:


Yes, I had just generated this same diff.
The only config change that could remotely make a difference is:

and I don't see how it could matter.


Last time being recently?  lkml accepts email sizes (with attachments)
up to 300 KB, IIRC.



That's already =m in this config file.


That's as expected.  CONFIG_ATA value controls CONFIG_SATA_AHCI
possible values.


So with CONFIG_ATA=m and CONFIG_SATA_AHCI=m, does 2.6.34-git4 boot
but 2.6.34-git5 fails to boot?


thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Sun Aug 1, 7:31 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Sun Aug 1, 8:28 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Bjorn Helgaas, (Sun Aug 1, 8:38 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Sun Aug 1, 9:21 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Bjorn Helgaas, (Mon Aug 2, 6:48 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Harald Hoyer, (Mon Aug 2, 8:59 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Harald Hoyer, (Mon Aug 2, 9:08 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Mon Aug 2, 11:38 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Frédéric L. W. Meunier, (Mon Aug 2, 3:09 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Frédéric L. W. Meunier, (Mon Aug 2, 3:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Mon Aug 2, 7:31 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Aug 2, 9:42 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Stefan Richter, (Tue Aug 3, 3:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Tue Aug 3, 9:26 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Aug 3, 9:40 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Tue Aug 3, 10:45 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Donald Parsons, (Tue Aug 3, 11:26 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Aug 3, 11:35 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Randy Dunlap, (Tue Aug 3, 3:34 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Aug 4, 1:15 pm)