Re: Linux 2.6.35

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 - 2:49 am

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:28:23PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

Cool. I was just looking at that.


Yes it shouldn't be common normally. I think the common case for distros
is just a few ACLs in /dev. Of course you never know for 
specific end user workloads.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.35, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Aug 1, 4:52 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun Aug 1, 5:32 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Dave Chinner, (Sun Aug 1, 7:33 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Aug 1, 7:50 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Dave Chinner, (Sun Aug 1, 10:58 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 12:55 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 1:14 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 2, 1:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Aug 2, 1:46 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Aug 2, 1:52 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 2, 2:05 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 2:51 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 3:07 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 3, 1:18 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Tue Aug 3, 2:28 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 3, 2:49 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Tue Aug 3, 8:05 am)