Re: Linux 2.6.35

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tuesday, August 3, 2010 - 1:18 am

Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> writes:


We started some testing of the VFS series on larger systems and so
far it looks all very good and the performance improvements are impressive
(but of course new bottlenecks are being exposed then)

The only snag found so far was that an ACL enabled file system
disables all the nice path walk improvements, so right now you
need to remount with noacl. I'm hoping this can be fixed
before a mainline release, otherwise I suspect it would disable
the improvements for lots of people (common distributions default
to acl on)

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Linux 2.6.35, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Aug 1, 4:52 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun Aug 1, 5:32 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Dave Chinner, (Sun Aug 1, 7:33 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Aug 1, 7:50 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Dave Chinner, (Sun Aug 1, 10:58 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 12:55 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 1:14 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 2, 1:24 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Mon Aug 2, 1:46 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Aug 2, 1:52 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 2, 2:05 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 2:51 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Mon Aug 2, 3:07 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 3, 1:18 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Nick Piggin, (Tue Aug 3, 2:28 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 3, 2:49 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35, Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Tue Aug 3, 8:05 am)