Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Sunday, August 29, 2010 - 11:24 am

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:34:07AM -0500, Murphy, Dan wrote:

This is an incorrect statement. disable_irq() is not safe to use on SMP when
caller may not sleep (since it will wait for the running handler to
complete), but in this context it is perfectly safe,

-- 
Dmitry
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver, Jonathan Cameron, (Fri May 21, 4:57 am)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver, Dmitry Torokhov, (Sun Aug 29, 11:24 am)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1/2] input: CMA3000 Accelerometer driver, Dmitry Torokhov, (Sun Aug 29, 11:49 am)
Re: Sensors and the input layer (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1 ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Mon Aug 30, 10:41 am)
Re: Sensors and the input layer (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1 ..., Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar, (Tue Aug 31, 10:24 am)
Re: Sensors and the input layer (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1 ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Tue Aug 31, 11:03 am)
Re: Sensors and the input layer (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1 ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Tue Aug 31, 11:14 am)
Re: Sensors and the input layer (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH V2 1 ..., Jonathan Cameron, (Tue Aug 31, 11:20 am)