Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Gwendal Grignou
Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010 - 5:40 pm

I submit a patch, but messed up with the --in-reply-to argument. Check
"libata-sff: Reenable Port Multiplier after libata-sff remodeling."
thread.

I can now see my drive:
Aug 27 17:42:36 halab-59 kernel: [  103.631293] ata_sff_exec_command:
ata5: cmd 0xEC
Aug 27 17:42:36 halab-59 kernel: [  103.634050] ata_sff_hsm_move:
ata5: protocol 2 task_state 2 (dev_stat 0x58)
Aug 27 17:42:36 halab-59 kernel: [  103.634053] ata_pio_sector: data read
Aug 27 17:42:36 halab-59 kernel: [  103.634228] ata_sff_hsm_move:
ata5: protocol 2 task_state 3 (dev_stat 0x50)
Aug 27 17:42:36 halab-59 kernel: [  103.634231] ata_sff_hsm_move:
ata5: dev 0 command complete, drv_stat 0x50

In general BMDMA does not support PMP, it assumes all qc are on ap->host.
sata_mv does it sometimes, I will submit a patch for that, after I
test the error path through-fully.

Gwendal.


On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com> wrote:
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Nicolas Jungers, (Sat Aug 21, 11:52 am)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Mark Lord, (Sat Aug 21, 12:13 pm)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Nicolas Jungers, (Sat Aug 21, 12:59 pm)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Jeff Garzik, (Sun Aug 22, 12:54 pm)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Jeff Garzik, (Sun Aug 22, 12:57 pm)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Maciej Rutecki, (Wed Aug 25, 12:00 pm)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Gwendal Grignou, (Fri Aug 27, 1:19 am)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Gwendal Grignou, (Fri Aug 27, 3:56 pm)
Re: possible esata regression in 2.6.35, Gwendal Grignou, (Sat Aug 28, 5:40 pm)