Re: mmotm 2010-08-27-15-43 uploaded

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Friday, August 27, 2010 - 4:18 pm

On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:43:34 -0700
akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:


This kernel generates a lockdep splat 

[   90.709824] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[   90.709824] 2.6.36-rc2-mm1 #9
[   90.709824] ---------------------------------------------------------
[   90.709824] kworker/0:1/0 just changed the state of lock:
[   90.709824]  (&(&sighand->siglock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffff81042deb>] lock_task_sighand+0x9a/0xda
[   90.709824] but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
[   90.709824]  (&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock){+.+...}

due to oom-add-per-mm-oom-disable-count.patch.

Otherwise, it's perfect.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
mmotm 2010-08-27-15-43 uploaded, akpm, (Fri Aug 27, 3:43 pm)
Re: mmotm 2010-08-27-15-43 uploaded, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 27, 4:18 pm)