Re: [PATCH] gpio: Add generic driver for simple memory mapped controllers

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: Add driver for Anton GPIO controllers by David Brownell on Thursday, August 26, 2010 - 3:48 pm. (2 messages)

Next thread: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: make epoll_wait() use the hrtimer range feature by Thomas Gleixner on Thursday, August 26, 2010 - 4:02 pm. (2 messages)
From: David Brownell
Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010 - 3:58 pm

--- On Thu, 8/26/10, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

I know you don't say that every time someone makes
different assumptions about context than you have.
So for now I guess I'll just feel special...

And I expect you'd have to admit that if indeed there
were some IP reuse happening, then everything I said
which assumed reuse would be true.  Likewise, that
such reuse does happen even for simple stuff like
GPIOs (to facilitate reuse of program code ... even
on  the 8-bit micros you mentioned, I've seen it).

--

From: Alan Cox
Date: Thursday, August 26, 2010 - 5:15 pm

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:58:51 -0700 (PDT)

I don't think its assumptions. In this case it's a case of actually
looking at what these devices are in the real world. Hence 'reality
check'.

Sure there are plenty of 're-usable' components that appear everywhere -
Designware etch turns up in everything but this isn't one of them.
--

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: Add driver for Anton GPIO controllers by David Brownell on Thursday, August 26, 2010 - 3:48 pm. (2 messages)

Next thread: Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: make epoll_wait() use the hrtimer range feature by Thomas Gleixner on Thursday, August 26, 2010 - 4:02 pm. (2 messages)