Re: [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mike Christie
Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 - 12:15 pm

On 08/25/2010 10:59 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:

I think it is more disruptive, but is the cleaner approach in the end.

#2 looks hacky. In upper layers, we will have checks for dasd and other 
AOE and other drivers. And then #2 does not even work for filesystems 
(ext said they need this).



--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Mike Christie, (Wed Aug 25, 12:15 pm)
Re: [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Hannes Reinecke, (Mon Aug 30, 4:38 am)
Re: [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Sergei Shtylyov, (Mon Aug 30, 5:07 am)
Re: [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Hannes Reinecke, (Mon Aug 30, 5:39 am)
Re: training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Mike Snitzer, (Tue Nov 30, 3:59 pm)
Re: training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Hannes Reinecke, (Fri Dec 17, 2:47 am)
Re: training mpath to discern between SCSI errors, Mike Snitzer, (Fri Dec 17, 7:06 am)