Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for oprofile

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 6:41 pm

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 06:57 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Even better would be to do the surgery at a higher level and provide the
oprofile API without the oprofile buffer management. My experience is
that it doesn't scale, and on heavily threaded large SMP setup, there is
an enormous amount of time wasted contending on the global oprofile
buffer mutex.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/3] sh: Accessor functions for the sh_pmu state, Matt Fleming, (Mon Aug 23, 3:46 am)
[PATCH 2/3] oprofile: Abstract the perf-events backend, Matt Fleming, (Mon Aug 23, 3:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for opr ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 23, 3:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for opr ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Aug 24, 6:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generalise ARM perf-events backend for opr ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Aug 25, 2:19 am)