2.6.34-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
commit 127c03cdbad9bd5af5d7f33bd31a1015a90cb77f upstream.
NR_IRQS may be as low as 16, causing a (harmless?) buffer overflow in
pcmcia_setup_isa_irq():
static u8 pcmcia_used_irq[NR_IRQS];
...
if ((try < 32) && pcmcia_used_irq[irq])
continue;
This is read-only, so if this address would be non-zero, it would just
mean we would not attempt an IRQ >= NR_IRQS -- which would fail anyway!
And as request_irq() fails for an irq >= NR_IRQS, the setting code path:
pcmcia_used_irq[irq]++;
is never reached as well.
Reported-by: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ module_param(io_speed, int, 0444);
#ifdef CONFIG_PCMCIA_PROBE
#include <asm/irq.h>
/* mask of IRQs already reserved by other cards, we should avoid using them */
-static u8 pcmcia_used_irq[NR_IRQS];
+static u8 pcmcia_used_irq[32];
#endif
static int pcmcia_adjust_io_region(struct resource *res, unsigned long start,
@@ -768,6 +768,9 @@ int pcmcia_request_irq(struct pcmcia_dev
for (try = 0; try < 64; try++) {
irq = try % 32;
+ if (irq > NR_IRQS)
+ continue;
+
/* marked as available by driver, and not blocked by userspace? */
if (!((mask >> irq) & 1))
continue;
--
