Re: Linux 2.6.35.3

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Sunday, August 22, 2010 - 6:31 pm

On 08/20/2010 09:06 PM, Mark Stanovich wrote:

By the way, I think only 69309a05907546fb686b251d4ab041c26afe1e1d should
solve the problem.  Mark, could you try only this patch?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Aug 20, 8:44 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Mark Stanovich, (Fri Aug 20, 9:06 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Aug 20, 9:41 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Greg KH, (Fri Aug 20, 9:50 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Aug 22, 6:31 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Mark Stanovich, (Sun Aug 22, 6:56 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Greg KH, (Sun Aug 22, 8:03 pm)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Mark Stanovich, (Mon Aug 23, 6:47 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Michael Tokarev, (Mon Aug 23, 11:04 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Aug 23, 11:45 am)
Re: Linux 2.6.35.3, Greg KH, (Mon Aug 23, 2:35 pm)