On Friday 20 August 2010 19:56:20 Glauber Costa wrote:
quoted text
> > @@ -675,6 +676,9 @@ struct kvm_clock_data {
> >  #define KVM_SET_PIT2              _IOW(KVMIO,  0xa0, struct kvm_pit_state2)
> >  /* Available with KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_PVINFO */
> >  #define KVM_PPC_GET_PVINFO     _IOW(KVMIO,  0xa1, struct kvm_ppc_pvinfo)
> > +/* Available with KVM_CAP_SET_TSC_RATE */
> > +#define KVM_X86_GET_TSC_RATE      _IOR(KVMIO,  0xa2, __u32)
> > +#define KVM_X86_SET_TSC_RATE      _IOW(KVMIO,  0xa3, __u32)
> 
> wrap this into a struct?

I don't think that would improve the code. Generally, we try to *avoid* using
structs in ioctl arguments, although KVM does have a precedent of using structs
there.

In fact, the code here could be simplified by using get_user/put_user on the
simple argument, which would not be possibly with a struct.

	Arnd
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/