On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:32 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:

quoted text
> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 09:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > Actually, thinking some more about it, that may not be a good idea.
> > Why? Simply because we may want to merge the vma's back together if
> > you do munlock. And it won't (and mustn't) merge if the vm_flags
> > differ in VM_GROWSDOWN.
> > 
> > So I do think we want to keep VM_GROWSDOWN (and VM_GROWSUP on
> PA-RISC)
> > even across a vma split.
> 
> I naively hacked something together and it did seem to work, but I
> shared your worries about merging.
> 
> > Of course, we could set a flag whether the vma really does have a
> > guard page or not.
> 
> Bits in vma->vm_flags seems to be in rather short supply :-( 

On the other hand the VMA merging is just an optimisation, isn't it?

-- 
Ian Campbell

Many people are desperately looking for some wise advice which will
recommend that they do what they want to do.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/