login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2010
»
August
»
20
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Christoph Hellwig
Subject:
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
Date: Friday, August 20, 2010 - 2:21 am
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:19:07PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
quoted text
> What about unifying the file identification here with the file handle used for open_by_handle()? That keeps a consistent identifier for the inode between multiple system calls (always a good thing), and allows the inode to be opened again via open_by_handle() if needed.
That's what the dmapi callouts that are intendeded to do just about the same as fanotify always did. I'm pretty sure I brought this up earlier in the discussion. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Fri Aug 6, 8:58 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Matt Helsley
, (Fri Aug 6, 4:34 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Fri Aug 6, 5:06 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Sat Aug 7, 12:15 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Matt Helsley
, (Sat Aug 7, 1:55 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Mon Aug 16, 1:32 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Mon Aug 16, 8:39 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Matt Helsley
, (Mon Aug 16, 9:03 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Tue Aug 17, 1:09 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Tue Aug 17, 1:38 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Tvrtko Ursulin
, (Tue Aug 17, 2:45 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Tue Aug 17, 3:01 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Tvrtko Ursulin
, (Tue Aug 17, 3:12 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Tvrtko Ursulin
, (Tue Aug 17, 3:55 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Tue Aug 17, 8:08 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Tue Aug 17, 8:24 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Tue Aug 17, 8:27 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Tue Aug 17, 8:48 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Wed Aug 18, 7:18 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Wed Aug 18, 8:47 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Eric Paris
, (Wed Aug 18, 8:59 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Wed Aug 18, 9:42 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Eric Paris
, (Wed Aug 18, 10:07 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 5:44 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Eric Paris
, (Thu Aug 19, 8:00 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 1:24 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 1:32 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Thu Aug 19, 1:42 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 2:07 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 2:22 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 4:41 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Thu Aug 19, 5:00 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Eric Paris
, (Thu Aug 19, 8:38 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Thu Aug 19, 8:50 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Dilger
, (Thu Aug 19, 10:19 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Tvrtko Ursulin
, (Fri Aug 20, 2:09 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Fri Aug 20, 2:21 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Fri Aug 20, 4:07 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Fri Aug 20, 5:16 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Fri Aug 20, 5:38 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Fri Aug 20, 8:29 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
, Andreas Dilger
, (Fri Aug 20, 1:39 pm)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Eric Paris
, (Mon Aug 23, 9:46 am)
Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree - try 37!
, Andreas Gruenbacher
, (Mon Aug 23, 3:38 pm)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ken Chen
[patch] sched: fix inconsistency when redistribute per-cpu tg->cfs_rq shares.
Nick Piggin
Re: [PATCH 2/2] smp_call_function: use rwlocks on queues rather than rcu
Kyle Moffett
Re: [PATCH 1/4] stringbuf: A string buffer implementation
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 00/12] mm/x86: bootmem
Andrew Morton
Re: [patch 1/5] wait: use lock bitops for __wait_on_bit_lock
git
:
Stephen Boyd
Re: [PATCH] Speed up bash completion loading
Jakub Narebski
Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?
Junio C Hamano
Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command
Catalin Marinas
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Stacked GIT 0.14.2
Eric Wong
[PATCH 5/5] rerere: add the diff command
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[POWERPC] fsl_soc: add support to gianfar for fixed-link property
Linux Kernel Mailing List
fat: fix parse_options()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ipmi: add oem message handling
Linux Kernel Mailing List
powerpc/85xx/86xx: Fix build w/ CONFIG_PCI=n
Linux Kernel Mailing List
KVM: x86 emulator: during rep emulation decrement ECX only if emulation succeeded
linux-netdev
:
Paweł Staszewski
Re: DCA/IOAT problem
Jarek Poplawski
Re: [PATCH iproute2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
Ingo Oeser
Re: [NET-NEXT PATCH 3/3] e1000e: add support for new 82574L part
Rick Jones
Re: UDP path MTU discovery
Dmitry Kozlov
Re: [PATCH v8] PPTP: PPP over IPv4 (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol)
openbsd-misc
:
David Vasek
Re: how to undelete?
Gruppo BCC
Banca inviato una notifica che e necessario completare
Pau Amaro-Seoane
Re: First install: Grub doesn't find partitions
Nick Holland
Re: Unattended OpenBSD Installation
stuart van Zee
Re: CVS hosed
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate