Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2010 » August » 2

Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB.
Date: Monday, August 2, 2010 - 8:47 am

On 08/02/2010 08:43 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:

Of course.  However, we need there to be as much structure to it as
there can be.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Xen-SWIOTLB v0.8.6 used for Xen PCI pass through f ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 9:59 am)
[PATCH 1/9] xen: use _PAGE_IOMAP in ioremap to do machine ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 9:59 am)
[PATCH 3/9] xen: Rename the balloon lock, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 9:59 am)
[PATCH 5/9] vmap: add flag to allow lazy unmap to be disab ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 9:59 am)
[PATCH 6/9] xen/mmu: inhibit vmap aliases rather than tryi ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 9:59 am)
[PATCH 7/9] swiotlb-xen: SWIOTLB library for Xen PV guest ..., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 10:00 am)
[PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 10:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Jul 27, 12:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Tue Jul 27, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Jul 27, 4:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Jul 27, 5:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., FUJITA Tomonori, (Tue Jul 27, 5:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Wed Jul 28, 3:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jul 28, 3:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., FUJITA Tomonori, (Thu Jul 29, 12:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Jul 29, 6:44 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Thu Jul 29, 9:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Mon Aug 2, 8:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Aug 2, 8:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Aug 2, 8:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Aug 2, 8:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Aug 2, 9:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, (Mon Aug 2, 9:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Aug 2, 9:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86: Detect whether we should use Xen SWIOTLB., FUJITA Tomonori, (Mon Aug 2, 10:35 pm)