Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andreas Gruenbacher
Date: Thursday, August 19, 2010 - 9:07 am

On Thursday 19 August 2010 17:44:29 Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

Yes, the pid field should be shrunk; it is a 32-bit value in user-space even 
on 64-bit platforms.  I also don't see that we'll ever need a 64-bit mask 
actually.

Andreas
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Schwab, (Sat Aug 14, 10:44 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Aug 19, 8:44 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Gruenbacher, (Thu Aug 19, 9:07 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Aug 19, 9:35 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Thu Aug 19, 10:53 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Fri Aug 20, 2:02 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Schwab, (Fri Aug 20, 2:16 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Fri Aug 20, 2:23 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Fri Aug 20, 6:13 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Schwab, (Fri Aug 20, 6:27 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Fri Aug 20, 8:19 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Fri Aug 20, 10:47 am)