Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Date: Thursday, August 19, 2010 - 8:44 am

On Saturday 14 Aug 2010 18:44:38 Andreas Schwab wrote:

No one seems to have picked up on this what I thought was an obvious good
idea.

So yes, 32-bit PID makes sense I think. If that was changed, would removing
the packed attribute get us anything more? If not it may stay for extra safety
if/when new fields are added.

Also, would it make sense to move mask in front of fd so 32-bit pid can stay
at the end? I think mask logically should be higher because is the more meta
data, while pid is auxiliary.

Tvrtko

Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, United Kingdom.
Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Schwab, (Sat Aug 14, 10:44 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Aug 19, 8:44 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Gruenbacher, (Thu Aug 19, 9:07 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Thu Aug 19, 9:35 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Thu Aug 19, 10:53 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Fri Aug 20, 2:02 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Schwab, (Fri Aug 20, 2:16 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Tvrtko Ursulin, (Fri Aug 20, 2:23 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Fri Aug 20, 6:13 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Andreas Schwab, (Fri Aug 20, 6:27 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Fri Aug 20, 8:19 am)
Re: struct fanotify_event_metadata, Eric Paris, (Fri Aug 20, 10:47 am)