Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: properly mark init functions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jerome Marchand
Date: Thursday, August 19, 2010 - 1:24 am

On 08/19/2010 02:28 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:

I guess we could. But it doesn't really matter, these are static functions which
are called from only one place, so they're inlined anyway. I don't know what the
convention is in such case.

Jérôme
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] ecryptfs: properly mark init functions, Jerome Marchand, (Tue Aug 17, 8:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: properly mark init functions, Tyler Hicks, (Wed Aug 18, 5:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: properly mark init functions, Jerome Marchand, (Thu Aug 19, 1:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: properly mark init functions, Tyler Hicks, (Fri Aug 20, 3:24 pm)