* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> [2010-08-18 11:13:03]:

quoted text
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Chris Webb wrote:
> 
> > > != 0.  And even then, zone reclaim should only reclaim file pages, not
> > > anon.  In theory...
> >
> > Hi. This is zero on all our machines:
> >
> > # sysctl vm.zone_reclaim_mode
> > vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
> 
> Set it to 1.
>

Isn't that bad in terms of how we treat the cost of remote node
allocations? Is local zone_reclaim() always a good thing or is it
something for chris to try and see if that helps his situation?

-- 
	Three Cheers,
	Balbir
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/