On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 04:55 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
We don't have NMIs on ARM [so obviously we can't use them!] but
you're right to point out the FIQ. I've actually been thinking about
this during the past week, but there are the following problems:
(1) The FIQ isn't always wired up in the hardware, so you can't
assume that it is available.
(2) The FIQ can only have a single handler at a given time. This
is because it is a separate exception mode, with its own banked
registers. Consequently, we might not be able to use it if it's
being used for something else.
(3) The Trustzone security extensions may reserve the FIQ for secure
use only or make it available only via the secure monitor [which
will increase latency].
Of course, the advantage is that we could then use sample-based
profiling techniques in sections of code where the interrupts are
disabled.
The only way I can think of adding this is as a Kconfig option,
which, when selected, tries to use the FIQ and then falls back to
normal IRQs if it fails.
Cheers,
Will
--
