Hi,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:10:22AM +0200, Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote:
quoted text
>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:03:44AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote:
>>>>No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset
>>>>for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe.
>>>>Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe.
>>
>>Typo. Earlier we were using 0xe and in the new implementation it has
>>been changed to 0xd.
>
>you're right, I'm not sure how I came up with that value since the TRM
>shows 0x0e, maybe a copy&paste error. Will change patch 1.

ok, it's because there's no register 0x0a. And I missed that when 
defined the register space. Good catch, thanks. I wonder why it didn't 
fail to write to that register address :-?

-- 
balbi

DefectiveByDesign.org
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/