> On Tuesday 17 August 2010 05:39:47 Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 22:32 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > On Saturday 07 August 2010 21:15:14 Eric Paris wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 20:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > I'm also totally missing on any re-post of these patches or
> > > > > discussion of the changes during the last development window.
> > > >
> > > > I just searched lkml an fsdevel where I usually send everything don't
> > > > see then. I totally failed.
> > >
> > > Oh yes.
> > >
> > > This introduces two new syscalls which will be impossible to fix up after
> > > the fact, and those system calls are poorly documented: commits 2a3edf86
> > > and 52c923dd document the initial versions (in the commit message!), but
> > > subsequent commits then extend that interface. The interface for
> > > replying to events is not documented at all beyond the example code [1].
> > > There is no documentation in Documentation/filesystems/, either.
> > >
> > > [1]
http://people.redhat.com/~eparis/fanotify/
>
> Oh ... this example doesn't actually build; both syscall prototypes are wrong.
> What have you been testing this with?