On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 16:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted text > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 16:09 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>
> > > -$(shell sh -c 'mkdir -p $(OUTPUT)scripts/{perl,python}/Perf-Trace-Util/' 2> /dev/null)
> > > -$(shell sh -c 'mkdir -p $(OUTPUT)util/{ui/browsers,scripting-engines}/' 2> /dev/null)
>
> > The other solution is to use standard-make features like in
> > mkdir -p $(foreach d,ui/browsers scripting-engines,$(OUTPUT)util/$(d)/) 2> /dev/null
> >
> > Is there actually a specific reason for the
> > $(shell sh -c '...')
> > around?
> > It looks superflous.
>
> I think the reason is is that nobody who touched that file really knew
> make all that well. Your version looks fine to me.
Ah, the reason is that they are not part of a rule but on the top-level
(and thus always executed).
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email :
bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at
LUGA :
http://www.luga.at
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't use brace expansion. , Bernd Petrovitsch , (Mon Aug 16, 7:54 am)