Re: [PATCH] cfq: improve fsync performance for small files

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Corrado Zoccolo
Date: Sunday, August 15, 2010 - 9:38 am

[+tytso]
Hi Theodore,
in order to fix a performance problem with fsync in cfq, we need to
mark write requests sent by jbd/jbd2 as synchronous, so cfq knows that
some process may be waiting on them, and therefore will avoid idling.
Is this change reasonable for you? Should I send the change to
jbd*/commit.cc in a separated patch through your tree?

Thanks
Corrado

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com> wrote:



-- 
__________________________________________________________________________

dott. Corrado Zoccolo                          mailto:czoccolo@gmail.com
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The self-confidence of a warrior is not the self-confidence of the average
man. The average man seeks certainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls
that self-confidence. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and
calls that humbleness.
                               Tales of Power - C. Castaneda
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] cfq: improve fsync performance for small files, Corrado Zoccolo, (Tue Jul 20, 1:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH] cfq: improve fsync performance for small files, Corrado Zoccolo, (Sun Aug 15, 9:38 am)
Re: [PATCH] cfq: improve fsync performance for small files, Corrado Zoccolo, (Sun Sep 12, 7:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] cfq: improve fsync performance for small files, Corrado Zoccolo, (Sat Oct 23, 10:31 am)