Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Friday, August 13, 2010 - 3:39 am

> I have a similar problem with the whole pm_qos subsystem, as I've said

Well firstly you want limits so SELinux says "No" (or rlimit or similar)
and secondly you want sysfs views.

This is like file permissions - its not hard
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Felipe Contreras, (Thu Aug 12, 12:05 pm)
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Aug 12, 8:28 pm)
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Alan Cox, (Fri Aug 13, 3:39 am)
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Aug 13, 8:07 am)
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Bernd Petrovitsch, (Mon Aug 16, 4:36 am)
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Aug 17, 6:18 am)
Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, tak ..., Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Aug 17, 10:33 am)