On 08/12/2010 03:52 PM, john stultz wrote:
quoted text >
> Ugh. I'm surprised it picks *this* loop to optimize instead of the
> similar one right above. I'm guessing its the local raw_nsecs value, but
> whatever. Also surprised Jason's testing didn't hit this issue, but its
> probably a gcc version thing.
>
> Regardless, I clearly need to give i386 more love in my testing.
> My profuse apologies.
>
> As suggested by Linus, here's the do_div explicit version. It builds ok
> on i386 & x86_64, but I have not yet tested it.
>
> Larry, Jason: Could you verify it works for you (and avoids the original
> issue)?
This one builds for me with both compilers. It appears to run OK. As to the
original issue - I don't think I ever saw the problem. I'll leave that question
for Jason.
Larry
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Problem with commit deda2e81961e96be4f2c09328baca4710a ... , Larry Finger , (Thu Aug 12, 8:17 pm)