On Thursday, August 12, 2010, Matt Helsley wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:35:43AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> > Matt Helsley a écrit :
...
quoted text
> You're right, cgroup_mutex should protect against that. However presumably
> that same logic applies to the first case. So again I don't think the bug
> is a race.
> 
> <snipped the remaining cases which should be the same>
> 
> At this point I think the bug description in your patch needs to change
> but the patch itself is perfect. Assuming you agree with my assessment
> of the bug I think the process is: you'll rewrite the description, add -stable
> maintaners to your current Cc's (since this bug is simple, exists in previous
> versions, and is somewhat nasty), add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> 
> and send it to Andrew Morton. Hopefully then (if not before) Paul and Li
> will ack it.

Actaully, I maintain the freezer, so please send it to me.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/