Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@infradead.org> wrote:

I agree with Mauro completely.  There is nothing userland should be
able to do which results in a panic (and I have no reason to believe
Pete was suggesting otherwise).  That said, it's really useful to know
that this is some sort of v4l1 backward compatibility problem.

I'll see if I can reproduce this here.

Thanks,

Devin

-- 
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection f ..., Sander Eikelenboom, (Tue Aug 10, 3:12 pm)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Devin Heitmueller, (Tue Aug 10, 3:45 pm)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Sander Eikelenboom, (Tue Aug 10, 3:57 pm)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Devin Heitmueller, (Tue Aug 10, 7:33 pm)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Sander Eikelenboom, (Wed Aug 11, 12:25 am)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Mauro Carvalho Chehab, (Wed Aug 11, 9:46 am)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Devin Heitmueller, (Wed Aug 11, 11:31 am)
Re: [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protectio ..., Sander Eikelenboom, (Wed Aug 11, 1:56 pm)