Simply add proper IDs into the device table.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>
---
It appears that the driver has two device ID tables. :-)
So, my previous attempt enabled only half of the functionality.
Andrew,
Can you please replace
edac-mpc85xx-add-support-for-mpc8569-edac-controllers.patch
with this patch? It also adds some more IDs for the newer chips.
Thanks!
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index 52ca09b..3820879 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -646,8 +646,12 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8555-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8568-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-l2-cache-controller", },
{},
};
@@ -1120,9 +1124,13 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8555-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8568-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8349-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-memory-controller", },
{},
};
--
1.7.0.5
--
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:25:07 +0400 L2 on the p4080 is quite different from those other chips. It's part of the core, controlled by SPRs. -Scott --
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:12:24 -0500
edac-mpc85xx-add-support-for-mpc8569-edac-controllers.patch already got
itself merged. I queued this:
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c~edac-mpc85xx-add-support-for-new-mpcxxx-pxxxx-edac-controllers
+++ a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -646,8 +646,12 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_er
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8555-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8568-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-l2-cache-controller", },
{},
};
@@ -1123,7 +1127,10 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_mc_er
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8349-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-memory-controller", },
{},
};
erm, was that an ack or a nack?
--
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:39:33 -0700 NACK, p4080 doesn't belong in this table, at least not its L2. L3 on p4080 is similar to L2 on these other chips, though, and it wouldn't take much to get this driver working on it -- but the match table entry should wait until the differences are accommodated. -Scott --
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:21:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>
---
Scott, thanks for catching this!
Andrew, please merge this patch into
edac-mpc85xx-add-support-for-new-mpcxxx-pxxxx-edac-controllers.patch
Thanks!
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index cfa86f7..b178cfa 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -652,7 +652,6 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,p1020-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p1021-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-l2-cache-controller", },
- { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-l2-cache-controller", },
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match);
--
1.7.0.5
--
Can you post a new patch as it doesn't look like this got merged by Andrew so we need to clean up after ourselves. - k --
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 01:18:19AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
It's already in Linus' tree.
Thanks,
- - - -
commit cd1542c8197fc3c2eb3a8301505d5d9738fab1e4
Author: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>
Date: Tue Aug 10 18:03:21 2010 -0700
edac: mpc85xx: add support for new MPCxxx/Pxxxx EDAC controllers
Simply add proper IDs into the device table.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <djiang@mvista.com>
Cc: Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index fdbad55..af75e27 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -647,7 +647,10 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_l2_err_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8555-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8560-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8568-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-l2-cache-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-l2-cache-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-l2-cache-controller", },
{},
};
@@ -1125,7 +1128,10 @@ static struct of_device_id mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8569-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8572-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc8349-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1020-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p1021-memory-controller", },
{ .compatible = "fsl,p2020-memory-controller", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,p4080-memory-controller", },
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpc85xx_mc_err_of_match);
--
Hm. Are you sure? I thought that only L2 cache controller is not applicable (and based on Scott's comment I removed the l2 cache compatible entry for p4080). But I guess memory-controller is somewhat similar to all other 85xx? If it's not, I can surely prepare a patch that removes p4080 entry. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 --
Your correct, late night and looking at the wrong line. It was the L2 that should have been removed. Ignore me. - k--
