Re: [PATCH] vhost: locking/rcu cleanup

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Sunday, August 1, 2010 - 1:41 am

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:49:54PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:

Well, We do requeue from the job itself. So need to be careful with what
we do with indexes here. Bug seemed to happen all the time when qemu was
killed under stress but now I can't reproduce anymore :(
Will try again later.


It is rare - happens on guest reboot typically. I guess I will
switch to regular synchronize_srcu.


Sure. It does seem that avoiding list lock would be pretty hard
in generic code though.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] vhost: locking/rcu cleanup, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Thu Jul 29, 5:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] vhost: locking/rcu cleanup, Tejun Heo, (Fri Jul 30, 7:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] vhost: locking/rcu cleanup, Michael S. Tsirkin, (Sun Aug 1, 1:41 am)